Open to suggestions
7047
0
- Communications & Media
- Religion & Theology
- Political science
- Healthcare & Medicine
- Finance
- Engineering
- Agriculture
- Anthropology
- Nursing
- Environmental science
- Philosophy
- Other
- Geology
- Biology
- Communication strategies
- Dance
- Art
- Architecture
- Education
- Theatre
- Journalism
- Statistics
- Accounting
- English
- Pathogenesis of disease
- History
- Law
- Pedagogy
- Public relations
- Social work
- Movies
- Natural science
- Economics
- Sociology
- Logistics
- IT & Technology
- Literature
- Nutrition
- Criminal justice
- Management
- Mathematics
- Geography
- Music
- Paintings
- Marketing
- Psychology
- Business
thx
GOOD WORK
Generally speaking the writing is acceptable, but I find I have to rewrite many of the papers and take out redundant remarks. The helpful thing is the central idea is laid out and it's easier to rephrase a paper then it is to start from scratch. Unfortunately, there's no way of knowing who you're getting to write the paper - some are better than others, but the deadline is usually met ahead of time - giving you plenty of time to retool the paper so it's acceptable for submission.
Overall content was good, but I did have to reword every paragraph because grammatically was extremely confusing to read.
great discussion. save my grade for the week
Very well written. Easy to follow. Would recommend this writer
terrible
Great job on this! Content, analysis, and the overall flow of the paper is great. Well done! Great writer and fast. Plus the assignment was finished early which gave time for the instructor to grade the paper and to have the paper redone if needed. Well done!
Great job on this! Content, analysis, and the overall flow of the paper is great. Well done! Great writer and fast. Plus the assignment was finished early which gave time for the instructor to grade the paper and to have the paper redone if needed. Well done!
really good quality, however, little more in depth research for 5 stars